On May 30, Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian presided over the routine meeting.
A reporter asked, in his recent speech on China policy toward China, US Secretary of State Blinken said that China poses the most serious long-term challenge to the international order, and the United States must defend and reform the “rules-based international order”. What is the spokesperson’s comment on this?
Photo source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Zhao Lijian said that Blinken’s speech on China is full of lies and inverted black and white, and the basis for attacking China is exactly what the United States does today. The United States itself wears the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order. The so-called “rules-based international order” advocated by the United States is to put it bluntly, the international order based on American rules is the hegemonic order that dominates the world with “family laws and regulations”. Last week, my colleagues have responded to the content of his speech. Today I am willing to list some facts and numbers to help everyone further see the US lies and fallacies and its hypocrisy.
First of all, the United States has no fear of the international order based on the UN Charter and international law. The United States has been in power for more than 200 years and has not fought for only 16 years. It has become the biggest source of chaos in the current international peace and stability and the biggest instability factor in the international order. The United States claims to defend the concepts of self-determination, sovereignty and peaceful settlement of disputes established by the UN Charter, but they are actually saying one thing and doing another. As American writer William Bloom pointed out in his book “Democracy: America’s Fatal Export”, since the end of World War II, the United States has tried to overthrow more than 50 foreign governments and violently interfere in democratic elections in at least 30 countries. According to a report from Brown University in the United States, since only 2001, the United States has been in the name of “counter-terrorism”, orThe war or military operations have caused more than 800,000 deaths, including 300,000 civilians, and more than 2,000 refugees have been generated by victimized countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria alone.
Secondly, the United States is the biggest destroyer of the international order. It has become common for the United States to stick to American-centrism and the American exception theory, and to break contracts and withdraw from the group at will. The United States not only refuses to sign or ratify the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, but also votes against the Global Compact on Immigration and the Global Compact on Refugees, but also exclusively blocks negotiations on the UN Protocol to the Verification of the Biological Weapons. Since the 1980s, the United States has withdrew from 17 international organizations or agreements including the United Nations Human Rights Council, the World Health Organization, UNESCO, the Paris Agreement, the Iran nuclear agreement, the Arms Trade Treaty, the Intermediate-February Treaty, the Open Skies Treaty, and other 17 international organizations or agreements, including the United Nations Human Rights Council, the World Health Organization, the United Nations Educational and Cultural Organization Agreement, and the United Nations Educational and Cultural Organization Agreement. Such an American is so arrogant that he disguised himself as a referee of international rules, using the so-called rules to shine on others, and ignoring the darkness under his own light. When US politicians are speaking with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea with a sensible argument, they don’t know if they know it. The United States is not even a party to the Convention.
Thirdly, the United States is not qualified to discuss rules at all. In the United States’ view, international rules have always been subordinate to and serve American interests and hegemony. When the two are consistent, the United States uses rules as a basis, and when they are contrary to each other, it regards rules as air. I would like to ask the US side to answer a few Babaylan questions: When the United States wants to launch a war against sovereign states, what are the rules? When the United States imposes illegal unilateral sanctions and traps people in relevant countries in trouble, what are the rules? When the United States continues to arrears of US$1 billion in membership dues and US$1.4 billion in peacekeeping assessments, what are the rules? When the United States engages in trilateral security partnerships and four-party mechanisms, in an attempt to create an Indo-Pacific version of NATO, disrupting the Asia-Pacific and undermining the international nuclear non-proliferation system, the rules are Cinema system and quadratic mechanisms, in an attempt to build an Indo-Pacific version of NATO, which will disrupt the Asia-Pacific and undermine the international nuclear non-proliferation system.//comicmov.com/”>Komiks? When the United States is under the banner of so-called democracy and is severing the camp, what are the rules? When the WTO clearly confirms that the US tariff war against China violates global trade rules, the US country does not implement it or even obstructs the WTO Appellate Body to appoint a new judge. When Komiks, what are the rules?
Finally, the United States is the culmination of coercive diplomacy. The United States has placed domestic law above international law and international rules, and has abused illegal unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction. Since the outbreak of the new crown pneumonia epidemic, Venezuela, Syria and Iran have been subject to long-term sanctions by the United States. The domestic economic and medical conditions are bad, and the epidemic situation is severe. The United States has not stopped sanctions, but has further increased its efforts, making these countries worse. The international community has become increasingly clear about the market competition principles and international economic and trade principles that the United States advocates, and is only in opposition to the United States. href=”https://comicmov.com/”>Babaylan will only be followed by the US when it is favorable. American politicians talk about fair competition and free trade, they believe in the United States first, and they wave the American stick in their hands. Zhao Lijian stressed that after more than 70 years of the founding of New China, we have not taken the initiative to launch a war or occupied an inch of land in other countries. We insist onCinema Komiks resolved disputes through dialogue and negotiation, and has completely resolved land border issues in a peaceful manner with 12 of the 14 onshore Cinema neighbors. As the world’s second largest economy, China’s contribution to global economic growth has remained at around 30% for many years, ranking first in the world for 15 consecutive years. China has become the second largest country in the United Nations’ membership fees and peacekeeping funds, activelyParticipate in the construction and reform of the global governance system, and maintain the spirit of the UN Charter and the authority of the UN with practical actions. Facts have proved and will continue to prove that China has always been a builder of world peace, a contributor to global development, and a defender of international order. China will always work with all peace-loving and justice-oriented countries to unite under the banner of the United Nations, practice true multilateralism, and continue to contribute confidence, wisdom and strength to the universal prosperity of the world and the common progress of mankind.