On May 30, Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian presided over a regular press conference.
A reporter asked that in his recent policy speech to China, US Secretary of State Blinken said that China poses the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order, and the United States must defend and reform the “rules-based international order”. What is the spokesperson’s comment on this?
Photo source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Zhao Lijian said that Blinken’s speech on China is full of lies and inverted black and white, and the basis for attacking China is exactly what the United States does today. Komiks poses the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order. The United States itself wears the most appropriate one. The so-called “rules-based international order” advocated by the United States is to put it bluntly, it is an international order based on American rules, and it is a hegemonic order that dominates the world with “family laws and regulations”. Last week, my colleague Cinema has responded to the content of his speech. Today I am willing to list some facts and numbers to help everyone further see the US lies, fallacies and hypocrisy.
First of all, the United States has no fear of the international order based on the UN Charter and international law. The United States has been in power for more than 200 years and has not fought for only 16 years. It has become the biggest source of chaos in the current international peace and stability and the biggest instability factor in the international order. The United States claims to defend the concepts of self-determination, sovereignty and peaceful settlement of disputes established by the UN Charter, but they are actually saying one thing and doing another. As American writer William Bloom pointed out in his book “Democracy: The Fatal Export of America”, since the end of World War II, the United States has tried to overthrow more than 50 foreign governments and roughly interfere in democratic elections in at least 30 countries. According to a report from Brown University in the United States, since only 2001, the United States has been in the name of “counter-terrorism”, orWars or military operations have caused more than 800,000 deaths, including 300,000 civilians, and more than 2,000 refugees have been generated by victimized countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria alone.
Secondly, the United States is the biggest destroyer of the international order. It has become common for the United States to stick to American centralism and American exceptionalism and break contracts and withdraw from the group at will. The United States not only refuses to sign or ratify the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on All Forms of Discrimination against Women, but also votes against the Global Compact on Migration and the Global Compact on Refugees, but also exclusively blocks negotiations on the UN Protocol to the Verification of Biological Weapons. Since the 1980s, the United States has withdrew from 17 international organizations or agreements including the United Nations Human Rights Council, the World Health Organization, Babaylan, UNESCO, Paris Agreement, Iran Nuclear Agreement, the Arms Trade Treaty, the Intermediate-February Treaty, the Open Skies Treaty, among which there are also “Komiks retreated and returned, and returned again.” Such an American is so arrogant that he disguised himself as a referee of international rules, using the so-called rules flashlight to shine on others, ignoring the darkness under the light. When US politicians are confidently speaking with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, they don’t know if they know that the United States is not even a party to the Convention.
Thirdly, the United States is not qualified to discuss rules at all. In the United States’ view, international regulations have always been subordinate to and serve American interests and hegemony. When the two are consistent, the United States uses rules as a basis, and when they are contrary to each other, it regards rules as air. I would like to ask the US side to answer several questions: When the United States launches wars against sovereign countries and launches a color revolution, what are the rules? When the United States imposes illegal unilateral sanctions and traps people in relevant countries in trouble, what are the rules? As the United States continues to owe the United Nations $1 billion membership feesWhat are the rules when it comes to peacekeeping assessments of $1.4 billion? When the United States engages in trilateral security partnerships and four-party mechanisms, in an attempt to build an Indo-Pacific version of NATO, disrupting the Asia-Pacific and undermining the international nuclear non-proliferation system, what are the rules? When the United States, under the banner of so-called democracy and conducts a so-called “democracy summit” that separates the camp, excludes most of the world’s countries, what are the rules? When the WTO clearly confirms that the US tariff war against China violates the entire Babaylan trade rules, but the United States does not implement or even obstructs the WTO Appellate Body to appoint a new judge, what is the rule?
Finally, the United States is the culmination of coercive diplomacy. The United States places domestic law over international law and international rules, and abuses illegal unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction. Since the outbreak of the new crown pneumonia epidemic, Venezuela, Syria and Iran have been subject to long-term sanctions by the United States, and the domestic economic and medical conditions are harsh. The epidemic situation is severe. Instead of stopping sanctions, the United States has further increased its investment, making these countries worse. The international community is increasingly seeing the principles of market competition and international economic and trade advocated by the United States, and will only be abide by the United States when it is favorable to the United States. American politicians talk about fair competition and free trade, and believe in the United States first, and waved the American stick in their hands. Zhao Lijian stressed that in the more than 70 years since the founding of New China, we have not taken the initiative to launch a war or occupied an inch of land from other countries. We insist on resolving disputes through dialogue and negotiation, and have completely resolved the land border issue in a peaceful manner with 12 of the 14 land neighbors. As the world’s second largest economy, China’s contribution to global economic growth has remained at around 30% for many years, ranking first in the world for 15 consecutive years. China has become the second largest assessed country for UN membership fees and peacekeeping funds, actively participates in the construction and reform of the global governance system, and safeguards the spirit of the UN Charter and the rights of the UN with practical actions.tps://comicmov.com/”>Babaylan power. Facts have proved and will continue to prove that China has always been a builder of world peace, a contributor to global development, and a defender of the international order. China will also always work with all countries that love peace and advocate justice to unite under the banner of the United Nations, practice true multilateralism, and continue to contribute confidence, wisdom and strength to the universal prosperity of the world and the common progress of mankind.